Difference between revisions of "Developer Meetings/20130326"

From Slicer Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
*the discussion about how to reorganize the modules in Slicer should continue.
 
*the discussion about how to reorganize the modules in Slicer should continue.
 
http://wiki.slicer.org/slicerWiki/index.php/Developer_Meetings/20130226#Module_reorganization
 
http://wiki.slicer.org/slicerWiki/index.php/Developer_Meetings/20130226#Module_reorganization
 +
 
*installed extensions do not display their logos but a generic image. Why?
 
*installed extensions do not display their logos but a generic image. Why?
 
[[image:Screen Shot 2013-03-20 at 3.18.35 PM.png|200px|thumb|right|This generic logo is displayed for all installed extensions]]
 
[[image:Screen Shot 2013-03-20 at 3.18.35 PM.png|200px|thumb|right|This generic logo is displayed for all installed extensions]]
 +
 
*the majority of the extensions do not have "advertising" information available. Where does this information come from?
 
*the majority of the extensions do not have "advertising" information available. Where does this information come from?
 
[[image:Screen Shot 2013-03-20 at 3.19.05 PM.png|200px|thumb|right|This is an example of the lack of advertising information that should be provided. virtually none of the extensions have that information available.]]
 
[[image:Screen Shot 2013-03-20 at 3.19.05 PM.png|200px|thumb|right|This is an example of the lack of advertising information that should be provided. virtually none of the extensions have that information available.]]
*The social media buttons do not work. What is their function?
+
 
[[image:Screen Shot 2013-03-20 at 3.28.33 PM.png|200px|thumb|right|These buttons do not do anything right now. If they were functional, what would they accomplish?]]
+
*The social media buttons do not work. What is their function? [[image:Screen Shot 2013-03-20 at 3.28.33 PM.png|200px|thumb|right|These buttons do not do anything right now. If they were functional, what would they accomplish?]]
 +
 
 +
[[image:Bad-aspect-ratio-Screen Shot 2013-03-26 at 7.59.29 AM.png|200px|thumb|right|The squashed images look terrible.  Also note that even the * Extension screenshots have the wrong aspect ratio
 +
social network icons are incorrectly resized so that google plus turns into google minus!  Fail.]]
 +
** appstore code should letterbox the images and not do a non-uniform scale
 +
 
 +
* The locale issue - who will take this on?
 +
** http://www.na-mic.org/Bug/view.php?id=3029
 +
 
 +
* Release scheduling for 4.3, 4.4
 +
** Remaining ITKv4 issues (broken CLIs, failing tests, win32 builds, others...?)
 +
** Turning on SimpleITK
  
 
*Ohloh presence:
 
*Ohloh presence:

Revision as of 12:04, 26 March 2013

Home < Developer Meetings < 20130326
  • the discussion about how to reorganize the modules in Slicer should continue.

http://wiki.slicer.org/slicerWiki/index.php/Developer_Meetings/20130226#Module_reorganization

  • installed extensions do not display their logos but a generic image. Why?
This generic logo is displayed for all installed extensions
  • the majority of the extensions do not have "advertising" information available. Where does this information come from?
This is an example of the lack of advertising information that should be provided. virtually none of the extensions have that information available.
  • The social media buttons do not work. What is their function?
    These buttons do not do anything right now. If they were functional, what would they accomplish?
The squashed images look terrible. Also note that even the * Extension screenshots have the wrong aspect ratio social network icons are incorrectly resized so that google plus turns into google minus! Fail.
    • appstore code should letterbox the images and not do a non-uniform scale
  • Release scheduling for 4.3, 4.4
    • Remaining ITKv4 issues (broken CLIs, failing tests, win32 builds, others...?)
    • Turning on SimpleITK
  • Ohloh presence:
    • There are currently three results for "Slicer4. See http://www.ohloh.net/p?q=slicer4
    • We should either have just "Slicer" / "3DSlicer"
    • or on project for each version:
      • 3DSlicer 2
      • 3DSlicer 3
      • 3DSlicer 4
    • I would suggest the first approach.
    • Hth
    • Jc
    • I don't think ohloh is meant to host multiple versions of the same project, I would advise against having multiple versions on ohloh. Especially because Slicer3 is not active anymore and Slicer4 is built on top of Slicer3, it contains all the Slicer3 information.
    • If you look at the top 50 projects in ohloh, none of them are related to a specific version.
    • Julien.