Difference between revisions of "Developer Meetings/20120904"

From Slicer Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 16: Line 16:
 
*** I would suggest not to build extension for the moment. <code>set(WITH_EXTENSIONS FALSE)</code>
 
*** I would suggest not to build extension for the moment. <code>set(WITH_EXTENSIONS FALSE)</code>
 
*** I think packaging of Slicer ITKv4 should be done after the following issue is addressed: [http://na-mic.org/Mantis/view.php?id=2115 2115]. Indeed, we need a mechanism to distinguish packages that will be uploaded on Midas.
 
*** I think packaging of Slicer ITKv4 should be done after the following issue is addressed: [http://na-mic.org/Mantis/view.php?id=2115 2115]. Indeed, we need a mechanism to distinguish packages that will be uploaded on Midas.
 +
*** Note also that be enabling <code>WITH_EXTENSIONS</code>, it means that:
 +
**** No extensions will be built with there is an error while building Slicer.
 +
**** It applies only to the "testing" extensions available in <code>Slicer/Extensions</code> folder.
 +
*** Extensions should be built instead using [https://github.com/Slicer/Slicer/blob/master/Extensions/CMake/SlicerExtensionsDashboardScript.TEMPLATE.cmake SlicerExtensionsDashboardScript.TEMPLATE.cmake]
 
* CTK patch for review and integration
 
* CTK patch for review and integration
 
** Could a CTK developer please review this pull request: https://github.com/commontk/CTK/pull/230 ?
 
** Could a CTK developer please review this pull request: https://github.com/commontk/CTK/pull/230 ?

Revision as of 18:30, 4 September 2012

Home < Developer Meetings < 20120904

Attendees:

To discuss

Conclusion