Difference between revisions of "Developer Meetings/20130326"

From Slicer Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 70: Line 70:
 
*Ohloh presence: All agree we should have on entry named "Slicer".
 
*Ohloh presence: All agree we should have on entry named "Slicer".
  
* Nicole, Sankhesh and Nicole discussed the "Model Hierarchies" +  "scene views" issue
+
* Nicole, Sankhesh and Julien discussed the "Model Hierarchies" +  "scene views" issue

Revision as of 14:20, 27 March 2013

Home < Developer Meetings < 20130326

To discuss

  • the discussion about how to reorganize the modules in Slicer should continue.

http://wiki.slicer.org/slicerWiki/index.php/Developer_Meetings/20130226#Module_reorganization

  • installed extensions do not display their logos but a generic image. Why?
This generic logo is displayed for all installed extensions
  • the majority of the extensions do not have "advertising" information available. Where does this information come from?
This is an example of the lack of advertising information that should be provided. virtually none of the extensions have that information available.
  • The social media buttons do not work. What is their function?
    • Jc: Waiting the functionality is implemented. Button will be hidden. See slicerappstore/pull/38
      These buttons do not do anything right now. If they were functional, what would they accomplish?
The squashed images look terrible. Also note that even the social network icons are incorrectly resized so that google plus turns into google minus! Fail.
  • Extension screenshots have the wrong aspect ratio
    • appstore code should letterbox the images and not do a non-uniform scale
  • Release scheduling for 4.3, 4.4 (Roadmap)
    • Remaining ITKv4 issues (broken CLIs, failing tests, win32 builds, others...?)
    • Turning on SimpleITK
  • Ohloh presence:
From Jc:
There are currently three results for "Slicer4. See http://www.ohloh.net/p?q=slicer4
 - Slicer4:  http://www.ohloh.net/p/slicer
 - pieper's Slicer4:  http://www.ohloh.net/p/piepers_Slicer4
 - Slicer: http://www.ohloh.net/p/3376
We should either have just "Slicer" / "3DSlicer"
or on project for each version:
  3DSlicer 2
  3DSlicer 3
  3DSlicer 4
I would suggest the first approach.
Hth
Jc
From Julien:
I don't think ohloh is meant to host multiple versions of the same project, I would advise against having multiple versions on ohloh. Especially because Slicer3 is not active anymore and Slicer4 is built on top of Slicer3, it contains all the Slicer3 information.
If you look at the top 50 projects in ohloh, none of them are related to a specific version.
Julien.
  • Model Hierarchies plus scene views
    • Crash on restoring Visual System scene view in Brain Atlas only after going into Models module 2557


Conclusion

  • Discussed module re-organization
    • The idea would be to move every "legacy" cli into an extension and create a "meta" extension allowing to install all these cli modules at ones.
    • Andriy is clarifying with Andras and Tamas the move of MRIBiasFieldCorrection" into legacy category.
  • Ohloh presence: All agree we should have on entry named "Slicer".
  • Nicole, Sankhesh and Julien discussed the "Model Hierarchies" + "scene views" issue