Difference between revisions of "Developer Meetings/20130226"

From Slicer Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 20: Line 20:
 
Image:Utilities-2013-02-21.png|Utilities: Should be converted to extensions, I would think. I am not quite sure about the Brains utilities. Perhaps Hans can chime in.
 
Image:Utilities-2013-02-21.png|Utilities: Should be converted to extensions, I would think. I am not quite sure about the Brains utilities. Perhaps Hans can chime in.
 
Image:DevelopersTools-2013-02-21.png|Developers tools: Is there a good reason not to turn this into an extension? Most people will not need this. Should performance test be moved to the testing category?
 
Image:DevelopersTools-2013-02-21.png|Developers tools: Is there a good reason not to turn this into an extension? Most people will not need this. Should performance test be moved to the testing category?
Image:Legacy-2013-02-21.png|Legacy: Should be turned into an extension. Demian, how about otsu, is the module used for DTI estimation or is ITK accessed directly?
+
Image:Legacy-2013-02-21.png|Legacy: Should be turned into an extension. Demian, how about otsu, is the module used for DTI estimation or is ITK accessed directly? http://www.slicer.org/slicerWiki/index.php/Documentation/Labs/DeprecatedModules
 
Image:Tests-2013-02-21.png|Testing: Utilities, testing, developers tools should all be reviewed and reorganized together. As a guiding principle, the presentation should target end users. Developers should be directed to the developer page on the wiki.  
 
Image:Tests-2013-02-21.png|Testing: Utilities, testing, developers tools should all be reviewed and reorganized together. As a guiding principle, the presentation should target end users. Developers should be directed to the developer page on the wiki.  
 
Image:WorkInProgress-2013-02-21.png|Work in progress: the current modules should be moved elsewhere. The category should be removed. All work in progress should happen through extensions
 
Image:WorkInProgress-2013-02-21.png|Work in progress: the current modules should be moved elsewhere. The category should be removed. All work in progress should happen through extensions
 
</gallery>
 
</gallery>

Revision as of 05:24, 22 February 2013

Home < Developer Meetings < 20130226

Introduction

The listing of modules should be organized from the vantage point of an early stage end user. Power users know what module they want and usually look in the alphabetic listing. Developer oriented tools should not be prominent and should not crowd the listings. Developers should be directed as much as possible to the wiki as a start point.

  • We should reorganize the listing of modules in such a way that each category has only one choice per category/subcategory presented initially and everything else is under a tab called "Advanced". This is consistent with the way modules in Slicer should be organized.
  • We should come up with guidance for developers on how to organize extensions. In some cases it makes sense for them to be in their own category and some cases, individual modules should be spread out to existing categories. Modules derived from extensions should have the extension acronym inside the module name. As a general rule, extension derived modules should be under the "advanced" section of a category so that the top level is not "messed up"

Listing of Modules