Difference between revisions of "Developer Meetings/20130226"
From Slicer Wiki
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | =Introduction= | ||
| + | *We should reorganize the listing of modules in such a way that each category has only one choice per category or subcategory presented initially and everything else is under a tab called "Advanced". This is consistent with the way modules in Slicer should be organized. | ||
| + | *We should come up with guidance how to organize extensions. In some cases it makes sense for them to be in their own category and some cases, individual modules should be spread out to existing categories. Modules derived from extensions should have the extension acronym inside the module name. As a general rule, extension derived modules should be under the "advanced" section of a category so that the top level is not "messed up" | ||
| + | |||
| + | =Listing of Modules= | ||
<gallery widths="200px" perrow="4" caption="Slicer 4 Module Reorganization 2013-02-26"> | <gallery widths="200px" perrow="4" caption="Slicer 4 Module Reorganization 2013-02-26"> | ||
Image:CoreModules-2013-02-21.png| Should we remove from or add to anything in this list? Also, wizards is empty and should be removed | Image:CoreModules-2013-02-21.png| Should we remove from or add to anything in this list? Also, wizards is empty and should be removed | ||
Image:Informatics-2013-02-21.png| Is something missing? | Image:Informatics-2013-02-21.png| Is something missing? | ||
Image:Registration-2013-02-21.png|Where does Resample belong? Its here, its under converters, its under diffusion. We might want to introduce a resample toplevel category and add some organization about what resample should be used when. | Image:Registration-2013-02-21.png|Where does Resample belong? Its here, its under converters, its under diffusion. We might want to introduce a resample toplevel category and add some organization about what resample should be used when. | ||
| − | Image:| | + | Image:Segmentation-2013-02-21.png| Editor is listed here and under core modules. Is this a good idea? |
| − | Image:| | + | Image:Quantification-2013-02-21.png|Is anything missing |
Image:| | Image:| | ||
Image:| | Image:| | ||
Revision as of 13:20, 21 February 2013
Home < Developer Meetings < 20130226Introduction
- We should reorganize the listing of modules in such a way that each category has only one choice per category or subcategory presented initially and everything else is under a tab called "Advanced". This is consistent with the way modules in Slicer should be organized.
- We should come up with guidance how to organize extensions. In some cases it makes sense for them to be in their own category and some cases, individual modules should be spread out to existing categories. Modules derived from extensions should have the extension acronym inside the module name. As a general rule, extension derived modules should be under the "advanced" section of a category so that the top level is not "messed up"
Listing of Modules
- Slicer 4 Module Reorganization 2013-02-26
Should we remove from or add to anything in this list? Also, wizards is empty and should be removed
Is something missing?
Where does Resample belong? Its here, its under converters, its under diffusion. We might want to introduce a resample toplevel category and add some organization about what resample should be used when.
Editor is listed here and under core modules. Is this a good idea?
Is anything missing
