Difference between revisions of "Developer Meetings/20121218"
From Slicer Wiki
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
** http://www.na-mic.org/Bug/view.php?id=2813 -- Need a volunteer to test the topic referenced [http://www.na-mic.org/Bug/view.php?id=2813#c7447 here] | ** http://www.na-mic.org/Bug/view.php?id=2813 -- Need a volunteer to test the topic referenced [http://www.na-mic.org/Bug/view.php?id=2813#c7447 here] | ||
** Complete list: [http://www.na-mic.org/Bug/search.php?project_id=3&status_id%5B%5D=10&status_id%5B%5D=20&status_id%5B%5D=30&status_id%5B%5D=40&status_id%5B%5D=50&sticky_issues=on&sortby=last_updated&dir=DESC&hide_status_id=-2&tag_string=ITKv4 here] | ** Complete list: [http://www.na-mic.org/Bug/search.php?project_id=3&status_id%5B%5D=10&status_id%5B%5D=20&status_id%5B%5D=30&status_id%5B%5D=40&status_id%5B%5D=50&sticky_issues=on&sortby=last_updated&dir=DESC&hide_status_id=-2&tag_string=ITKv4 here] | ||
| − | + | * Force unique MRML node names? (http://na-mic.org/Mantis/view.php?id=2687) | |
== Conclusion == | == Conclusion == | ||
| − | + | * ITKv4 will need more testing | |
| − | + | ** Packaging on windows still to be sorted out | |
| − | + | ** Need to check for failing tests, ideally with dashboard machines | |
| + | ** Still some EMSegmenter build errors to work through on windows (not yet captured in bug reports) | ||
| + | * Discussion of threading in SimpleITK (leading to creation of [http://www.na-mic.org/Wiki/index.php/2013_Project_Week:Threaded_SimpleITK_Modules project for SLC]) | ||
| + | * Discussion of issues for DICOM breakout session at SLC | ||
| + | * Discussion of Endoscopy module bugs | ||
Latest revision as of 23:07, 18 December 2012
Home < Developer Meetings < 20121218To discuss
- ITKv4 issues:
- http://www.na-mic.org/Bug/view.php?id=2114
- http://www.na-mic.org/Bug/view.php?id=2813 -- Need a volunteer to test the topic referenced here
- Complete list: here
- Force unique MRML node names? (http://na-mic.org/Mantis/view.php?id=2687)
Conclusion
- ITKv4 will need more testing
- Packaging on windows still to be sorted out
- Need to check for failing tests, ideally with dashboard machines
- Still some EMSegmenter build errors to work through on windows (not yet captured in bug reports)
- Discussion of threading in SimpleITK (leading to creation of project for SLC)
- Discussion of issues for DICOM breakout session at SLC
- Discussion of Endoscopy module bugs
