Difference between revisions of "Developer Meetings/20121030"
From Slicer Wiki
m (→Conclusion) |
m (→Conclusion) |
||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
** Question: How the process could be improved to anticipate such issue early on ? | ** Question: How the process could be improved to anticipate such issue early on ? | ||
** Workaround: The data will be modified. Steve. | ** Workaround: The data will be modified. Steve. | ||
| + | * Discuss failing test "py_RSNA2012Quant" | ||
| + | ** Probably be related to the redesigned associated with ROI node | ||
Revision as of 19:57, 30 October 2012
Home < Developer Meetings < 20121030Attendees:
To discuss
- Sync expectation regarding the CLI used to read DICOM
- Discuss how tutorials testing could be improved.
- Discuss failing RSNA tutorial test.
- Mailing List questions
Conclusion
- PETStandardUptakeValueComputation would need to be changed to accommodate new data. Two days before the release, it's not reasonable to change the module.
- Question: How the process could be improved to anticipate such issue early on ?
- Workaround: The data will be modified. Steve.
- Discuss failing test "py_RSNA2012Quant"
- Probably be related to the redesigned associated with ROI node
