Slicer-3.6-QA
Return to Slicer 3.6 documentation
- This page contains our assessment of the Slicer 3.6 modules
- See also the module culling event at the end of April 2010
Contents
Testing Status
Core Modules
Score | Name | Documentation | Help [1] | Acknowledgment [2] | Test coverage [3] | valgrind errors | Current Owner | Comments [4] |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gold | my module | complete | yes and yes | yes, yes, yes | 80% | 0 | DNK | |
?? | Camera | complete | yes, no link | no | 75% | unknown | Sebastien Barre | |
?? | Volumes | complete | yes and yes | yes and yes | 44% | unknown | Steve Pieper | |
?? | Diffusion Editor | complete | yes and yes | no | 65%* | unknown | CF Westin | Files found under svn.slicer.org/Slicer3/trunk/Modules/Volumes/ |
?? | Models | complete | yes and yes | yes and yes | 12% | unknown | Alex Yarmarkovich | |
?? | Measurements | complete | yes and yes | no and yes | 46% | unknown | Nicole Aucoin | |
?? | Fiducials | complete | yes and yes | no | 7% | unknown | Nicole Aucoin | |
?? | Data | complete | yes and yes | yes and yes | 10% | unknown | Steve Pieper | |
?? | Slices | complete | no | no | 40% | unknown | Jim Miller | |
?? | Colors | complete | yes and no | yes and no | 8% | unknown | Nicole Aucoin | |
?? | Interactive Editor | complete | no and yes | yes and no | unknown | unknown | Steve Pieper | unable to determine percent coverage using our method, due to module written in .tcl |
?? | ROI Module | complete | no and yes | no and yes | 22% | unknown | Alex Yarmarkovich | |
?? | Volume Rendering | complete | yes and yes | no and yes | 22% | unknown | Yanling Liu |
Application CLI Modules
Score | Name | Documentation | Help [1] | Acknowledgment [2] | Test coverage [3] | valgrind errors | Current Owner |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gold | my module | complete | yes and yes | yes, yes, yes | 80% | 0 | |
?? | DiffusionWeightedTest | no | no | yes and yes | 69.8% | 0 | Raul San Jose Estepar |
?? | DiffusionTensorEstimation | complete | yes and no | yes and yes | 79.7% | 9 | Raul San Jose Estepar |
?? | DiffusionTensorMathematics | no | yes and no | yes and yes | 56.2% | 5 | Raul San Jose Estepar |
?? | OrientImage | complete | yes and yes | yes and yes | 85.7% | 0 | Bill Lorensen |
?? | LinearRegistration | complete | yes and no | yes and yes | 66.7% | 4 | Daniel Blezek |
?? | RigidRegistration | no | yes and no | yes and yes | 1.0% | 92 | Daniel Blezek |
?? | AffineRegistration | complete | yes and no | yes and yes | 1.4% | 82 | Casey Goodlett |
?? | BSplineDeformableRegistration | complete | yes and yes | yes and yes | 82.3% | 6 | Bill Lorensen |
?? | TestGridTransformRegistration | no | no | yes and yes | 90.7% | 0 | Yinglin Lee |
?? | CheckerBoard | complete | yes and yes | yes and yes | 67.4% | 0 | Bill Lorensen |
?? | ResampleScalarVolume | complete | yes and yes | yes and yes | 57.1% | 0 | Bill Lorensen |
?? | PolyDataToLabelmap | no | yes and yes | yes and yes | 87.9% | 0 | Nicole Aucoin, Xiaodong Tao |
?? | GaussianBlurImageFilter | complete | yes and no | yes and yes | 55.9% | 0 | Julien Jomier, Stephen Aylward |
?? | ConfidenceConnected/SimpleRegionGrowing | no | yes and no | yes and yes | 87.5% | 0 | Jim Miller |
?? | ExecutionModelTour | no | yes and yes | yes and yes | 87.2% | 0 | Daniel Blezek, Bill Lorensen |
?? | ImageReadDicomWrite | no | yes and yes | yes and yes | 86.1% | 0 | Bill Lorensen |
?? | CurvatureAnisotropicDiffusion | complete | yes and yes | yes and yes | 64.3% | 0 | Bill Lorensen |
?? | GradientAnisotropicDiffusion | complete | yes and yes | yes and yes | 63.4% | 0 | Bill Lorensen |
?? | MedianImageFilter | complete | yes and yes | yes and yes | 51.1% | 0 | Bill Lorensen |
?? | DWIDicomLoad | complete | yes and yes | yes and yes | 0% | (disabled) | Kerstin Kessel |
?? | HistogramMatching | complete | yes and yes | yes and yes | 65.0% | 0 | Bill Lorensen |
?? | OtsuThresholdImageFilter | no | yes and yes | yes and yes | 100% | 0 | Bill Lorensen |
?? | OtsuThresholdSegmentation | complete | yes and no | yes and yes | 90.9% | 0 | Bill Lorensen |
?? | Subtract | complete | yes and yes | yes and yes | 71.7% | 0 | Bill Lorensen |
?? | Multiply | no | yes and no | yes and yes | 77.6% | 0 | Bill Lorensen |
?? | Add | complete | yes and yes | yes and yes | 84.9% | 0 | Bill Lorensen |
?? | Threshold | no | yes and no | yes and yes | 55.8% | 0 | Nicole Aucoin |
?? | Mask | complete | yes and no | yes and yes | 80.0% | 0 | Nicole Aucoin |
?? | Cast | complete | yes and no | yes and yes | 14.6% | 0 | Nicole Aucoin |
?? | VotingBinaryHoleFillingImageFilter | complete | yes and yes | yes and yes | 100% | 0 | Bill Lorensen |
?? | ModelMaker | complete | yes and yes | yes and yes | 57.4% | 1 | Nicole Aucoin |
?? | MultipleModelsExample | no | yes and no | yes and yes | 1.9% | 50 | Nicole Aucoin |
?? | GrayscaleModelMaker | no | yes and no | yes and yes | 82.1% | 1 | Bill Lorensen |
?? | MergeModels | no | yes and yes | yes and yes | 62.7% | 0 | Nicole Aucoin, Daniel Haehn |
?? | GrayscaleFillHoleImageFilter | complete | yes and yes | yes and yes | 57.1% | 0 | Bill Lorensen |
?? | GrayscaleGrindPeakImageFilter | complete | yes and yes | yes and yes | 64.5% | 0 | Bill Lorensen |
?? | LabelMapSmoothing | no | yes and no | yes and yes | 87.9% | 0 | Dirk Padfield, Josh Cates, Ross Whitaker |
?? | ImageLabelCombine | complete | yes and no | yes and no | 7.5% | 50 | Alex Yarmarkovich |
?? | ResampleVolume2 | no | yes and yes | yes and yes | 46.8% | 0 | Francois Budin |
?? | ZeroCrossingBasedEdgeDetectionImageFilter | no | yes and no | yes and yes | 62.5% | 0 | Elliot Uvero |
?? | FreesurferSurfaceSectionExtraction | no | yes and no | yes and yes | 60.0% | 62 | Katharina Quintus |
Testing Partition
Most Slicer modules have a GUI component and a Data Processing component.
Testing GUI components is still a challenge, so we will focus here on testing the Data Processing components. This can be done in most cases by partitioning the module into a GUI section and a Data Processing section, where the second one usually takes the form of a C++ class (although that is not a requirement).
The data processing section can be tested by using standard CTest/CMake mechanisms. Basically by adding ADD_TEST() entries to the CMakeLists.txt file of the module.
Luis Ibanez' scoring system
The following scoring will be applied to the data processing sections of all modules:
Score | Code Coverage | Valgrind Errors | Documentation | Tutorial |
---|---|---|---|---|
Gold | > 80% | 0 | yes | yes |
Silver | > 70% | < 10 | yes | yes |
Bronze | > 60% | < 50 | yes | yes |
Clay | > 50% | < 100 | yes | yes |
Coal | < 50% | > 100 | yes | yes |
Hazard | unknown | unknown | no | no |
The code coverage and Valgrind error must be the ones reported on the Nightly Slicer Dashboard. Anecdotal data is not acceptable.