Difference between revisions of "Developer Meetings/20160419"
From Slicer Wiki
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
= To Discuss= | = To Discuss= | ||
| − | * | + | * Problems with packaging SlicerOpeCV Example extension |
| + | ** https://github.com/SBU-BMI/SlicerOpenCV/issues/6 | ||
| + | * When should we think about porting to Qt? | ||
| + | * Package signing | ||
| + | |||
= Updates = | = Updates = | ||
= Conclusion = | = Conclusion = | ||
| + | * Jc has package signing as a priority | ||
| + | * We discussed looking for an intern who could try building slicer qt5 | ||
| + | * The ITK community is setting up cloud build systems and we can learn from their experience | ||
Latest revision as of 14:13, 19 April 2016
Home < Developer Meetings < 20160419To Discuss
- Problems with packaging SlicerOpeCV Example extension
- When should we think about porting to Qt?
- Package signing
Updates
Conclusion
- Jc has package signing as a priority
- We discussed looking for an intern who could try building slicer qt5
- The ITK community is setting up cloud build systems and we can learn from their experience
